<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What CMS Says (And Doesn&#8217;t Say) About Small and Rural Providers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worh.org/hit/2010/01/what-cms-says-and-doesnt-say-about-small-and-rural-providers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worh.org/hit/2010/01/what-cms-says-and-doesnt-say-about-small-and-rural-providers/</link>
	<description>What &#34;Meaningful Use&#34; Means to Rural</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meaningful Use Attestations in 2011: CMS/ONC Raw Dataset Tells Hospital Story</title>
		<link>http://www.worh.org/hit/2010/01/what-cms-says-and-doesnt-say-about-small-and-rural-providers/comment-page-1/#comment-7430</link>
		<dc:creator>Meaningful Use Attestations in 2011: CMS/ONC Raw Dataset Tells Hospital Story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worh.org/hit/?p=238#comment-7430</guid>
		<description>[...] would continue to have lower levels of HIT adoption than large hospitals and systems (see this link for some of the reasons). What’s interesting about the MU attestation results is the extent to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would continue to have lower levels of HIT adoption than large hospitals and systems (see this link for some of the reasons). What’s interesting about the MU attestation results is the extent to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

